The Occult, Fallen Angels and Aliens Podcast

“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him”. — Revelation 12:9

New Atlantis: Secrets of the Entity Saint Germain and the United States Declaration of Independence

(In order for you to gain a better understanding of the so-called “New Atlantis” project one has to look at the “Old Atlantis” first, who they were and what happened to that civilisation? in this previously published article titled Atlantis: The sunken Island of hybrid god men)

“And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. — 2 Corinthians 11:14”

The Entity Saint Germain known as “The Professor

Who is Saint Germain?

“According to New Age believers, the ascended master Saint Germain is the chohan of the seventh ray and sponsor of the United States of America. He is a master alchemist of the sacred fire who comes bearing the gift of the violet flame of freedom for world transmutation.

Together with his twin flame, the ascended lady master Portia, the Goddess of Justice, he is the hierarch of the Aquarian age. He is the great sponsor of freedom’s flame, while Portia is the sponsor of the flame of justice and opportunity. The name Saint Germain comes from the Latin Sanctus Germanus, meaning simply “Holy Brother.” — Source“

Throughout his life, Francis Bacon’s fondest hope was the, creation of a Utopia across the Atlantic, the realization of his “New Atlantis” in the form of a society of free men, governed by sages and scientists, in which his Freemasonic and Rosicrucian principles would govern the social, political and economic life of the new nation. It was for this reason why, as Lord Chancellor, he took such an active interest in the colonization of America, and why he assisted in the founding of Jamestown, Virginia. For it was in America, through the pen of Thomas Paine and the writings of Thomas Jefferson, as well as through the revolutionary activities of his many Rosicrucian-Freemasonic followers, most prominent among whom were George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, that he hoped to create a new nation dedicated to his political philosophy.

In his Secret Destiny of America, Manly Hall, Bacon’s most understanding modern scholar, refers to the appearance in America, prior to the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776, of a mysterious Rosicrucian philosopher, a strict vegetarian who ate only foods that grew above the ground, who was a friend and teacher of Franklin and Washington and who seemed to have played an important role in the founding of the new republic. Why most historians failed to mention him is a puzzle, for that he existed is a certainty.

He was known as the “Professor.” Together with Franklin and Washington, he was a member of the committee selected by the Continental Congress in 1775 to create a design for the American Flag. The design he made was accepted by the committee and given to Betsy Ross to execute into the first model.

A year later, on July 4, 1776, this mysterious stranger, whose name nobody knew, suddenly appeared in Independence Hall and delivered a stirring address to the fearful men there gathered, who were wondering whether they should risk their lives as traitors by affixing their names to the memorable document which Thomas Jefferson wrote and of whose ideals Francis Bacon, founder of Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism, was the true originator.

The flag unfurled at Cambridge, Mass. in 1775, which the Professor designed, symbolized the union of the colonies; it was called the Grand Union Flag, and its design was as follows: In the blue field of the upper left-hand corner was the white diagonal cross of St. Andrews. Imposed on this was the Red Cross, which was given the name of St. George. The thirteen stripes, seven of red and six of white, alternating in the flag, represented the thirteen colonies.

The flag was used for some time, but owing to its similarity with the British flag, which supposedly symbolized the unity of England and Scotland, considerable controversy arose over it. In order to overcome this objection, in 1776 it was decided to design another flag which would follow the spirit of the original design; and the inverted triangle over the upright triangle, generally known as the St. Andrew’s Cross, a Masonic symbol of Kabbalistic origin and denoting that the originator of the flag was a Freemason and Rosicrucian, was preserved by using a six-pointed star, placed in irregular fashion on a blue back-ground in the form of a new constellation.

When General Johnson and Doctor Franklin visited Mrs. Elizabeth Ross, otherwise known as Betsy Ross, to get her cooperation in making the flag, the five-pointed star appealed to her as being more beautiful than the six-pointed star of the Professor’s original design which the committee accepted. Hence, out of deference to her sense of beauty, the five-pointed stars were used instead, and thirteen of them were placed in a circle on a blue field with the standard seven red and six white stripes completing the flag. This sample flag was made just before the Declaration of Independence, although the resolution endorsing it was not passed by the Continental Congress until July 14, 1777.

A second time did this mysterious stranger, the “Professor,” whose name and origin was unknown, play a vital role in American history. This time it was at the signing of the Declaration’ of Independence. It was on June 7, 1776, that Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, offered in Congress the first resolution declaring that the United Colonies were, and of right ought. to be, free and independent states. Soon after Mr. Lee introduced his resolution, he was taken sick and returned to his home in Virginia, whereupon on June 11th, 1776, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston were appointed as a committee to prepare a formal Declaration of Independence.

On the first of July, 1776, the committee made its report to Congress. On the second of July, Lee’s resolution was adopted in its original words. During the third of July, the formal Declaration of Independence was reported by the committee and debated with great enthusiasm. The discussion was resumed on the fourth, Jefferson having been elected as chairman of the committee.

On July 4th, there was great suspense throughout the nation. Many were adverse to severing the ties with the mother country; and many feared the vengeance of the king and his armies. Many battles had been fought already, but no decisive victory had been won by the rebel colonists. Each man in the Continental Congress realized as Patrick Henry did that it was either Liberty or Death. A rash move could mean death. After all, they were not free but subjects of a king who considered them as rebels and could punish them accordingly. They could be convicted for treason and put to death.

Just what connection did the mysterious stranger who designed the American flag and encouraged the signing of the Declaration of Independence have to Francis Bacon or Count Saint-Germain? Writing on this subject, Manly Hall says:

“Many times the question has been asked: Was Francis Bacon’s vision of the ‘New Atlantis’ a prophetic dream of the great civilization which was so soon to rise upon the soil of the New World? It cannot be doubted that the secret societies of Europe conspired to establish upon the American continent ‘a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that ‘all men are created equal.’ Two incidents in the early history of the United States evidence the influence of that Secret Body, which has so long guided the destinies of peoples and religions. By them nations are created as vehicles for the promulgation of ideals, and while nations are true to these ideals they survive; when they vary from them, they vanish like the Atlantis of old which had ceased to ‘know the gods.’”

In his admirable little treatise, “Our Flag,” Robert Allen Campbell revives the details of an obscure, but most important, episode of American history — the designing of the Colonial flag of 1775. The account involves a mysterious man concerning whom no information is available other than that he was on familiar terms with both General Washington and Dr. Benjamin Franklin. The following description of him is taken from Campbell’s treatise:

“Little seems to have been known concerning this old gentleman; and in the materials from which this account is compiled, his name is not even once mentioned, for he is uniformly spoken of or referred to as ‘the Professor.’ He was evidently far beyond his threescore and ten years; and he often referred to historical events of more than a century previous just as if he had been a living witness to their occurrence; still he was erect, vigorous and active—hale, hearty and clear-minded, as strong and energetic every way as in the prime of life. He was tall, of fine figure, perfectly easy, very dignified in his manners, being at once courteous, gracious and commanding. He was, for those times, and considering the customs of the Colonists, very peculiar in his method of living; for he ate no flesh, fowl or fish; he never used for food any ‘green thing’, any roots or anything unripe; he drank no liquor, wine or ale; but confined his diet to cereals and their products, fruits that were ripened on the stem in the sun, nuts, mild tea and the sweet of honey, sugar and molasses. [ Editor’s note: The Comte de Saint Germain’s same abstemious behavior regarding food was well documented in Europe.]

Saint Germain as ascended master jesus/sananda/immanuel/cosmic christ

“He was well educated, highly cultivated, of extensive as well as varied information, and very studious. He spent considerable of his time in the patient and persistent scanning of a number of very rare old books and ancient manuscripts which he seemed to be deciphering, translating or rewriting. These books, and manuscripts, together with his own writings, he never showed to anyone; and he did not even mention them in his conversations with the family, except in the most casual way; and he always locked them up carefully in a large, old-fashioned, cubically shaped, iron-bound, heavy oaken chest, whenever he left his room, even for his meals. He took long and frequent walks alone, sat on the brows of the neighboring hills, or mused in the midst of the green and flower-gemmed meadows. He was fairly liberal — but in no way lavish — in spending his money, with which he was well supplied. He was a quiet, though a very genial and very interesting member of the family; and he was seemingly at home upon any and every topic coming up in conversation. He was, in short, one whom everyone would notice and respect, whom few would feel well acquainted with, and whom no one would presume to question concerning himself — as to whence he came, why he tarried or whither he journeyed.”

“By something more than a mere coincidence, the committee appointed by the Colonial Congress to design a flag accepted an invitation to be guests, while at Cambridge, of the family with which the Professor was staying. It was here that General Washington joined them for the purpose of deciding upon a fitting emblem. By the signs that passed between them, it was evident that General Washington and Doctor Franklin recognized the Professor, and by unanimous approval, he was invited to become an active member of the committee. During the proceedings which followed, the Professor was treated with the most profound respect and all his suggestions immediately acted upon. He submitted a pattern which he considered symbolically appropriate for the new flag, and this was unhesitatingly accepted by the six other members of the committee, who voted that the arrangement suggested by the Professor be forthwith adopted. After the episode of the flag, the Professor quickly vanished; and nothing further is known concerning him.

“Did General Washington and Doctor Franklin recognize the Professor as an emissary of the Mystery School which has so long controlled the political destinies of this planet? Benjamin Franklin was a philosopher and a Freemason — possibly a Rosicrucian initiate. He and the Marquis de Lafayette — also a man of mystery — constitute two of the important links in the chain of circumstance that culminated in the establishment of the original thirteen American colonies as a free and independent nation. Dr. Franklin’s philosophic attainments are well attested in Poor Richard’s Almanac, published by him for many years under the name of Richard Saunders. His interest in the cause of Freemasonry is also shown in his publication of Anderson’s Constitutions of ‘Freemasonry.

“It was during the, evening of July 4, 1776, that the second of these mysterious episodes occurred. In the old State House in Philadelphia, a group of men were gathered for the momentous task of severing the tie between the old country and the new. It was a grave moment, and not a few of those present feared that their lives would be the forfeit for their audacity. In the midst of the debate a fierce voice rang out. The debaters stopped and turned to look upon the stranger. Who was this man who had suddenly appeared in their midst and had transfixed them with his oratory? They had never seen him before, none knew when he had entered; but his tall form and pale face filled them with awe. His voice ringing with a holy zeal, the stranger stirred them to their very souls. His closing words rang. through the building, ‘God has given America to be free!’ As the stranger sank into a chair exhausted, a wild enthusiasm burst forth. Name after name was placed upon the parchment: the Declaration of Independence was signed. But where was the man who had precipitated the accomplishment of this immortal task — who had lifted for a moment the veil from the eyes of the assemblage and revealed to them a part at least of the great purpose for which the new nation was conceived? He had disappeared, nor was he ever seen or his identity established. This episode parallels others of a similar kind recorded by ancient historians attendant upon the founding of every new nation. Are they coincidence, or do they indicate that the Divine Wisdom of the Ancient Mysteries still is present in the world, serving mankind as it did of old?”

Source

²⁶ And as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be also in the days of the Son of Man: ²⁷ They ate, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. ²⁸ Likewise as it was also in the days of Lot: They ate, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built; ²⁹ but on the day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. ³⁰ Even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed. —Luke 17:26-30

Nephilim And The Nordic Connections

“The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.” —Genesis 6:4

By Leif Liljestrom

I heard someone on the Internet talking about if there are some connections in the Nordic myths with the Nephilim and Genesis 6. I may have some bits to share about this, although my knowledge is far from complete in that subject. That which I know is mostly about the historical part of the peoples of Scandinavia and Northern Europe, and not so much about the religious parts.

A very little known fact from the writings of Snorri Sturluson, is that the “gods” Odin, Thor, Frey, Baldr, and others, were human beings, who later became deified by the Vikings¹. About 100 BC, these men and their two nations, the Aesir and the Vanir, emigrated from the Black Sea area, through Russia (then Scythia), and from there they followed the coastline of the Baltic Sea (today’s Baltic nations of Poland and Germany), up into Denmark, and then they rowed over to the Scandinavian peninsula². There they were greeted by the native king Gylfi, who didn’t mind new people coming, as his vast kingdom had diminished since its heyday during the Bronze age.³

The Aesir’s and Vanir’s migration to Scandinavia according to the Icelandic sagas

Soon the new inhabitants also met a race of very huge people, whom they called Jotuns, giants. These were not as friendly as the Gylfi people, so there were some hostilities (remembered in the Thor sagas), but as these giants were few, too, most of them retreated to the Arctic area, where they lived on for a couple of hundred years. During this time, these peoples mixed their seed (including many daughters of the giants), and a very strong race of Nordic people arose.⁴

16th century depiction of the giant king Inge Stenkilsson. Courtesy Wikipedia

A thousand years later, during the Viking age, many of the kings of the Vikings still were well over 2 meters tall. This is a scientifically stated fact. Graves have been opened in modern times, and skeletons of Swedish kings have been measured. Inge Stenkilsson (“Inge the Elder”), who killed the last heathen king,) was 2.16 m (7.09 feet).⁵ Harald Hardrada of Norway was said to have been 7 feet. These kings boasted their ancestry from the giants, and from Odin and Frey.

Where had the giants come from? Well, there is evidence that suggests they originated from Phoenicia (which of course is not far from Mount Hermon). On Bronze Age rock carvings on the Scandinavian west coast, there are many giants depicted, usually coming in huge ships and in company with an army of smaller humans (does Goliath and the Philistines ring a bell?). These ships have been confirmed as similar to Phoenician ships. There are also symbols depicted that clearly reveals a connection with Mediterranean peoples of that time.⁶ The Phoenicians had colonies all over the Mediterranean Sea in that age.

Giants on rock carvings in Bohuslan

Surprisingly, in the Nordic Bronze Age, about 1500 BC to 500 BC, the climate of Scandinavia was as in southern France today.⁷ This was a nordic paradise! It was seen as a wonder by those who came here, especially they who knew the coldness in the central of Europe at that time. This probably was what originated the legend of Hyperborea.

The Nordic giants and their Nephilim origin was well known by medieval Norse scholars, but is nowadays either denied or forgotten.⁸

Beowulf with the arm of Grendel

Even the Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf has remnants of this fascinating history. The figure Gremlin is a troll living in Denmark (troll and giant was synonymous from the beginning), which is killed by the Geatish sea warrior Beowulf. Geatland is the same as nowadays Götaland, the southern part of the Scandinavian peninsula. The story is preserved only in Anglo-Saxon, but the origin was written, or probably sung, in Denmark and Geatland.

And they knew about the flood of Noah! And the race of giants, who had to be killed because of their unnatural origin. They knew also about the post flood giants, and about all those Nephilim spirits who came out of the flesh of the giants!⁹

Some Beowulf scholars have noticed this and come to the conclusion that the Nordics of those days (500’s) even must have had knowledge of the Book of Enoch. Wow, that’s interesting.¹⁰

Much more could be said of the Nordic giants and of the mixed race that became the ancestors of modern northern Europe. For example the royal and noble lines of today, who are directly descended from those huge kings. And of several once well-known Nordic giants, who took part in the raids of the Vikings and their predecessors, as Hygelac (Hugleik)¹¹, Starkad (Starkodder), Ganger Hrolf (“Rollo”) – or were slain by them, as Long-leg (Langbein).

Notes

---

¹ Snorri writes that they fashioned their “gods” after the Greek mythology, which was well-known around the Black Sea. Not that glorious, but still interesting, as there may be otherwise lost fragments about the past preserved in the Norse “version” of the age of the gods/angels.

This is the prologue of the Prose Edda, where this story is told:
Excerpts from the Prose Edda.

² It is believed they carried with them on their journeys small skin-boats that could be folded. That way they could follow the floods through Russia all the way to the Baltic Sea. (See Of Odin’s Feats.)

³ Heimskringla 1 – 11.

⁴ From what I have gathered, it seems to have been a practice to kill the male giants but marry their daughters, which is interesting in connection with the “soul of the Nephilim” question. Were they led by Providence, and by the Divinely proclaimed judgment* against the Nephilim, to do this? It would seem that almost all of [us] are related to the Nephilim through their female line, as it could be assumed that this practice wasn’t unique for the North. Apparently, a child to a human male and a Nephilim female gets a human soul, or rather human spirit, while the opposite creates a being with a Nephilim spirit.

As of Psalm 82, which is a postflood parallel to the judgments issued in Enoch chapters 10 to 15. Asaph the Seer, who wrote that Psalm, saw and initiated that judgment, in a similar way that Enoch did, in his age.

On mixed races, see Hervarar saga Chapter 1.

⁵ And part of a family-line where all were of about that size:
http://hem.spray.se/gustoria/Historia/Vastergotland_kyrkor.htm
http://fornvannen.se/pdf/1920talet/1922_026.pdf

Click to see larger image

⁶ Comparison of Bronze Age Nordic and Mediterranean ships:

⁷ Bronze age rock-carvings on the east-coast of Sweden. Or  Here

⁸ “In his History of Denmark (1775), Suhm tells: ‘. . . Messenius says that the Canaanites that were driven out by Joshua came to Scondia, which they thereafter called Scandinavia. . . . Arngrim Jonae, the learned Icelander, states that the Canaanites who were driven out by Joshua, were the first inhabitants in the North.’ (p. 101).)”

⁹ Beowulf quotes:

“On kin of Cain was the killing avenged by sovran God for slaughtered Abel. Ill fared his feud, and far was he driven, for the slaughter’s sake, from sight of men. Of Cain awoke all that woful breed, Etins* and elves and evil-spirits, as well as the giants that warred with God weary while: but their wage was paid them!” (Beowulf 107-114)

* Post flood giants/nordic giants.

“Then the golden hilt, for that gray-haired leader, hoary hero, in hand was laid, giant-wrought, old. So owned and enjoyed it after downfall of devils, the Danish lord, wonder-smiths’ work, since the world was rid of that grim-souled fiend, the foe of God, murder-marked, and his mother as well. Now it passed into power of the people’s king, best of all that the oceans bound who have scattered their gold o’er Scandia’s isle. Hrothgar spake — the hilt he viewed, heirloom old, where was etched the rise of that far-off fight when the floods o’erwhelmed, raging waves, the race of giants (fearful their fate!), a folk estranged from God Eternal: whence guerdon due in that waste of waters the Wielder paid them.” (Beowulf 1677-1693)

“Grendel’s mother, monster of women, mourned her woe. She was doomed to dwell in the dreary waters, cold sea-courses, since Cain cut down with edge of the sword his only brother, his father’s offspring*: outlawed he fled, marked with murder, from men’s delights warded the wilds. — There woke from him such fate-sent ghosts as Grendel, who, war-wolf horrid, at Heorot found a warrior watching and waiting the fray, with whom the grisly one grappled amain. But the man remembered his mighty power, the glorious gift that God had sent him, in his Maker’s mercy put his trust for comfort and help: so he conquered the foe, felled the fiend, who fled abject, reft of joy, to the realms of death, mankind’s foe.” (Beowulf 1258-1276)

* Notice that Cain and Abel here are said to have the same father, which means Cain is not seen as a son of the serpent. Also notice that the kin of Cain are identified as giants and devils, which means the serpent seed entered humanity after the time in Eden.

But why then didn’t this knowledge live on into later times? The Viking Age literature, a couple of hundred years later, doesn’t say anything about this. In Beowulf it tells of a civil war between the Geats and the Sweona, were the Sweona, who were heathens, won and subdued the Geats. That would have suppressed the Christian influence on the Geats. But when Sweden finally became “Christianized” (last of all the North-European nations), it were the Geats who first received the missionaries of that time although of course that was a kind of proto-christendom, still very warlike.

¹⁰ Pride and Prodigies: Studies in the monsters of the Beowulf-manuscript, page 65.

There is also much that suggests that the Geats, who were the forefathers of the Goths (same word, just different pronounciation), still had lively connections with the Goths in southern Europe, who were “Christians” (most of them were Arians, or Semiarians), and that explains why the Geats in Beowulf had some knowledge (although skewed) of biblical things already in the 500’s.

¹¹“And there are monsters of an amazing size, like King Hygelac, who ruled the Geats and was killed by the Franks, whom no horse could carry from the age of twelve. His bones are preserved on an island in the river Rhine, where it breaks into the Ocean, and they are shown as a wonder to travellers from afar.” (Pride and Prodigies: Liber Monstrorum)

Source